Tractive Performance of Wheeled Tractor Based on OECD Code Test Reports
-
摘要:
拖拉机是农机工业的核心,牵引性能是拖拉机的重要性能之一。对OECD规则试验报告牵引性能研究分析表明,四轮驱动、无配重状态下,85.1%的拖拉机最大牵引力比值>400 N/kW、86.5%的拖拉机最大牵引功率百分比>75%、最大牵引比油耗平均值274.59 g/(kW·h)。重型拖拉机牵引性能优于大型拖拉机,也优于中型拖拉机。94.6%的拖拉机最小使用比质量>44 kg/kW、最小使用比质量50~55 kg/kW是发挥拖拉机牵引性能最优区间。不同换挡方式影响拖拉机牵引性能,无级变速传动拖拉机最大牵引力比值更大,动力换挡传动拖拉机最大牵引比油耗更低,二者牵引性能均优于机械传动式拖拉机。
Abstract:Tractor is core of agricultural machinery industry, and tractive performance is one of important performance of tractor.Through research on tractive performance of OECD code test reports, it was shown that, under four-wheel drive and no counterweight conditions, 85.1% of tractors have a maximum traction ratio greater than 400 N/kW, 86.5% of tractors have a maximum traction power percentage greater than 75%, and average maximum traction ratio fuel consumption was 274.59 g/(kW·h).Heavy tractors have better traction performance than large tractors and also better than medium-sized tractors.94.6% of tractors have a minimum usage specific mass greater than 44 kg/kW, and a minimum usage specific mass of 50 kg/kW to 55 kg/kW was optimal range for maximizing tractor traction performance.Different gear shifting methods affected traction performance of tractors.The maximum traction ratio of continuously variable transmission tractors was greater, and the maximum traction ratio fuel consumption of power shift transmission tractors was lower.Both traction performance was better than mechanical transmission tractors.
-
Keywords:
- wheeled tractor /
- tractive performance /
- drawbar power /
- power shift transmission /
- OECD code
-
表 1 OECD规则试验数据统计
Table 1. Statistics of OECD code test data
项目名称 最大值 最小值 平均值 标准差 最小使用质量/kg 24514.00 2595.00 7428.28 4251.95 发动机标定功率/kW 413.93 60.09 135.69 81.96 动力输出轴标定功率/kW 360.32 51.80 118.07 80.29 最大牵引力/kN 242.69 26.53 70.62 44.12 最大牵引功率/kW 410.31 42.80 111.82 78.57 牵引比油耗/
[g·(kW·h)−1]350.00 233.00 274.59 28.47 表 2 不同功率类型试验拖拉机牵引性能
Table 2. Tractive performance for different powers of tested tractors
拖拉机类型 功率K/kW 最大牵引力比值均值/(N·kW−1) 最大牵引功率百分比均值/% 牵引比油耗均值/[g·(kW·h)−1] 中型 K<73.5 518.39 77.76 298.44 大型 73.5≤K<147.0 517.13 79.45 281.09 重型 K≥147.0 527.96 85.42 249.25 表 3 不同最小使用比质量牵引性能及得分
Table 3. Tractive performance and scores at different specific minimum operation mass
最小使用比质量范围 最大牵引力比值均值/(N·kW−1) 最大牵引功率百分比均值/% 牵引比油耗均值/[g·(kW·h)−1] 牵引性能得分 比质量<45 415.01 78.12 264.40 0 45≤比质量<50 420.11 80.74 265.62 19.50 50≤比质量<55 490.41 83.38 267.00 46.83 55≤比质量<60 533.83 80.53 270.06 27.76 60≤比质量<65 578.35 80.35 282.67 20.99 比质量≥65 665.11 79.75 299.63 12.40 表 4 不同换挡方式试验拖拉机牵引性能
Table 4. Tractive performance of different gear shifting methods
换挡方式 发动机标定功率
均值/kW最大牵引力比值
均值/(N·kW−1)最大牵引功率百分比
均值/%牵引比油耗
均值/[g·(kW·h)−1]机械式 84.22 454.63 77.97 290.67 动力换挡 127.55 525.21 81.96 265.07 无级变速 178.75 558.56 81.59 274.11 -
[1] 张桃林副部长在全国农业机械化工作会议上的讲话及典型发言材料[EB/OL].(2022-03-21).http://www.njhs.moa.gov.cn/nyjxhqk/202203/t20220321_6393117.htm. [2] 谢斌,武仲斌,毛恩荣.农业拖拉机关键技术发展现状与展望[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(8): 1 - 17 .XIE Bin,WU Zhongbin,MAO Enrong.Development and prospect of key technologies on agricultural tractor[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery,2018,49(8): 1 - 17 . [3] 白学峰,马立新,乔璐,等.国内外农用拖拉机先进技术研究及对比分析[J].中国农机化学报,2019,40(9): 199 - 205 .BAI Xuefeng,MA Lixin,QIAO Lu,et al.Research and comparative analysis of advanced technology of agricultural tractors at home and abroad[J].Joural of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization,2019,40(9): 199 - 205 . [4] 汪漫,孙德超,屈年全.轮式拖拉机牵引性能的影响因素及改善方法[J].农机化研究,2004,26(3): 258 - 259 . [5] 李涛,安长江,康璟.轮式拖拉机牵引试验方法研究[J].农机质量与监督,2018(3): 26 - 28 . [6] 畅雄勃.机械变速拖拉机牵引功率试验研究[J].中国农机化学报,2016,37(3): 128 - 131,161 .CHANG Xiongbo.Experimental research on drawbar power for tractor with mechanical tranmission[J].Joural of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization,2016,37(3): 128 - 131,161 . [7] 孙震东,任越光,关朋,等.OECD拖拉机试验规则及其发展动向简介[J].拖拉机与农用运输车,2012,39(3): 1 - 6 .SUN Zhendong,REN Yueguang,GUAN Peng,et al.Brief introduction to OECD tractor test codes and development[J].Tractor & Farm Transporter,2012,39(3): 1 - 6 . [8] 畅雄勃.无级变速拖拉机牵引性能测试技术[J].中国农机化学报,2015,36(2): 161 - 164,188 .CHANG Xiongbo.Research on drawbar power test for tractor with stepless transmission[J].Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization,2015,36(2): 161 - 164,188 . [9] 任越光,李京忠.农业和林业拖拉机OECD官方试验标准规则[M].北京:中国质检出版社,2018. [10] 拖拉机术语 第1部分 整机:GB/T 6960.1—2007[S]. [11] 姚飞,马博帅,李凯,等.农业拖拉机各项性能评价指标及试验方法[J].农机化研究,2021,43(6): 247 - 252 .YAO Fei,MA Boshuai,LI Kai,et al.Performance evaluation and test methods of agricultural tractors[J].Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research,2021,43(6): 247 - 252 . [12] 赵亮,卢贵忠.四轮驱动拖拉机的牵引动力学分析研究[J].机械工程师,2017(12): 66 - 68 ,72.ZHAO Liang,LU Guizhong.Study on traction dynamics of four-wheel drive tractor[J].Mechanical Engineer,2017(12): 66 - 68 . [13] 农业部农垦局.拖拉机[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2009. [14] 拖拉机 功率分类及型谱:JB/T 11320—2013[S]. [15] 韦红美,廖应学.拖拉机牵引装置的优化性能研究[J].农机化研究,2021,43(2): 255 - 258 .WEI Hongmei,LIAO Yingxue.Research on improved performance of tractor draft gear[J].Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research,2021,43(2): 255 - 258 . [16] 杜建刚,韩兴昌.拖拉机、工程机械车辆牵引负荷车工作机理的研究[J].农业装备与车辆工程,2020,58(7): 57 - 60 .DU Jiangang,HAN Xingchang.Research on working mechanism of tractor and construction machinery traction load vehicle[J].Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering,2020,58(7): 57 - 60 . [17] 尹永芳,鲁力群,赵静,等.拖拉机全动力换挡自动变速器技术应用现状与展望[J].拖拉机与农用运输车,2019,46(2): 1 - 5 .YIN Yongfang,LU Liqun,ZHAO Jing,et al.Application status and trend of tractor full-power shift transmission technology[J].Tractor & Farm Transporter,2019,46(2): 1 - 5 .