中国农业机械化科学研究院集团有限公司 主管

北京卓众出版有限公司 主办

谷物联合收获机配套高粱专用割台收获谷子效果对比试验

Comparative experiment on harvesting effect of foxtail millet combine harvester equipped with sorghum dedicated cutting platform

  • 摘要: 为筛选适合山西省谷子收获的联合收获机,解决谷子机械化收获中损失率高的问题,以张杂谷3号为试验对象,以两台谷物联合收获机为试验平台,同时搭载高粱收获割台,在山西省河曲县开展谷子收获作业效果对比试验。结果表明,江苏沃得锐龙4LZ-6.0E型谷物联合收获机总损失率平均值8.58%,最高9.28%;久保田EX118Q(4LZ-6.5A8)型谷物联合收获机总损失率平均值5.83%,最高6.25%。其中,脱粒损失占总损失的比例较大(约占总损失的2/3),两台收获机割台损失和倒伏损失相当,锐龙4LZ-6.0E型夹带损失明显高于久保田EX118Q型,锐龙4LZ-6.0E型平均破损率(0.101%)低于久保田EX118Q型(0.127%),锐龙4LZ-6.0E型平均含杂率(2.79%)低于久保田EX118Q型(5.87%)。在山西省收获谷子时,可选用久保田EX118Q型谷物联合收获机,搭载高粱收获割台;如经济条件有限,也可选择锐龙4LZ-6.0E型谷物联合收获机。

     

    Abstract: To screen suitable combine harvesters for foxtail millet harvesting in Shanxi Province and solve high loss rate in mechanized foxtail millet harvesting, a comparative experiment was conducted in Hequ County, Shanxi Province, with experimental object Zhangzagu No.3 and two grain combine harvesters equipped with sorghum dedicated cutting platform.Experimental results showed that Jiangsu Wode Ruilong 4LZ-6.0E combine harvester had an average total loss rate of 8.58%, with a maximum of 9.28%, KUBOTA EX118Q(4LZ-6.5A8)combine harvester had an average total loss rate of 5.83%, with a maximum of 6.25%.Among these, threshing losses account for a significant proportion of total losses(approximately 2/3 of total losses).Both models exhibited comparable cutting platform losses and lodging loss.Ruilong 4LZ-6.0E model showed significantly higher entrainment loss than KUBOTA EX118Q.Ruilong 4LZ-6.0E model had a lower average damage(0.101%)than KUBOTA EX118Q(0.127%), and its average impurity rate(2.79%)was lower than that of KUBOTA EX118Q(5.87%).For foxtail millet harvesting in Shanxi Province, KUBOTA EX118Q grain combine harvester equipped with a sorghumdedicated cutting platform was recommended.If economic conditions are limited, Ruilong 4LZ-6.0E grain combine harvester is also a viable option.

     

/

返回文章
返回