中国农业机械化科学研究院集团有限公司 主管

北京卓众出版有限公司 主办

富氢水对土壤酶活性及豇豆生长的影响

Effects of hydrogen-rich water on soil enzyme activity and cowpea growth

  • 摘要: 探究富氢水(hydrogen-rich water,HRW)对土壤酶活性及豇豆生长的影响,为富氢水在蔬菜绿色低碳种植中的应用提供参考。采用单因素试验,比较富氢水与清水处理下,土壤酶活性,以及豇豆苗期性状、植株性状、产量与产值、品质、抗性和虫害被害率。结果表明,富氢水处理在豇豆苗期、始花期、采收期的土壤脱氢酶、过氧化氢酶、脲酶和磷酸酶活性均显著高于清水处理;播种20 d后,富氢水处理豇豆幼苗全株鲜质量、根鲜质量等指标显著高于清水处理;富氢水处理豇豆播种至出苗期缩短5 d,始花期缩短7 d,始收期提早6 d,采收结束期延长9 d,全生育期延长9 d;富氢水处理豇豆主蔓长、叶长、叶宽大于清水处理;富氢水处理豇豆荚长增加11.88%,荚横径增加33.33%,单荚质量增加22.65%,产量和产值增加均为21.24%;富氢水处理维生素 C含量、可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白含量和脂肪含量均显著高于清水处理;富氢水处理病虫害施药次数显著低于清水处理,炭疽病、枯萎病等病情指数和豆荚螟、蜗牛被害率显著低于清水处理;富氢水处理农残低于清水处理,均符合标准。

     

    Abstract: By exploring effects of hydrogen-rich water(HRW)on soil enzyme activities, as well as cowpeas growth, a reference was provided for HRW application in green and low-carbon vegetables cultivation.Experiment adopted a single-factor test to compare soil enzyme activities, seedling traits, plant traits, yield and output value, quality, resistance, and percent of infestation under HRW and general water.Results showed that activities of soil dehydrogenase, catalase, urease, and phosphatase in HRW were significantly higher than those in general water during cowpeas seedling stage, initial flowering stage, and harvesting stage.20 days after sowing, fresh weight of whole cowpea seedlings and roots fresh weight treated with HRW were significantly higher than those in general water.In HRW treatment shortened period from sowing to seeding emergence by 5 days, initial flowering stage by 7 days, harvesting stage by 6 days, and extended harvesting completion period by 9 days, with whole growth period by 9 days.Length of main stem, leaf length, and leaf width of cowpea treated with HRW were greater than those in general water.Length of cowpea pods treated with HRW increased by 11.88%, pods transverse diameter increased by 33.33%, a single pod weight increased by 22.65%, and yield and output value per hectare increased by 21.24%.Vitamin C content, soluble sugar content, soluble protein content, and fat content in HRW treatment were significantly higher than those in general water.Pesticides application frequency for diseases and insect pests in HRW treatment was significantly lower than general water.Disease indices for anthracnose, wilt disease, and other diseases, as well as damage rates caused by Etiella zinckenella and snails were significantly lower than those treated with general water.Agricultural residues in HRW treatment were lower than those in general water and both met standards.

     

/

返回文章
返回